• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles


Community Reputation

302 Excellent


About Azemboz

  • Rank
  • Birthday
  • Portal profile Azemboz

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Portal profile Azemboz
  1. 1) Get good 2) I see it in game all the time, and say it in game all the time 3) You don't speak for the playerbase, or even a small portion of the playerbase. You only speak for yourself, and you are insignificant.
  2. Confirmation bias, dude.
  3. These people need to stay the [edited] out of ranked. There is zero excuse for me to be sitting at a 50% winrate at ranked right now when my soft stats are so damn high.
  4. Players like you are all just seals to me, no matter what ship or tier you're in.
  5. My comment was directed at those who consider cruisers unplayable, which is ludicrous.
  6. What's it like in the fantasy world you've built for yourself? Comfy temperature?
  7. You don't win even when you try.
  8. 155k 2 kill loss.
  9. Oh look, a thread full of bad players who don't know how to kite.
  10. No, you still aren't getting it. I didn't check your stats, I figured you were bad at 10s based on your assessment of the tier 10 meta. 44 matches is too small of a number to draw any conclusions from, especially with a lowish WTR (Although WTR is wonky in ranked). You went and checked ranked stats in a desperate bid to make yourself look better, not me. I already explained to you in very simple words why my ranked stats don't reflect my playstyle. I have over 400 matches in ranked, but over half of those are from the pilot season and season one. Back then, I wasn't very good at the game. I think I was 50% overall. So, you're fishing around for old stats from before I decided to get gud. Do you really think that having 44 matches with a low WTR means I wouldn't hit you so hard you'd quit for the day? I don't have to twist anything, you're doing that for me with this little hunt through my profile. I bring up stats when they are applicable to a situation. You know what isn't applicable? Stats from two years ago. You're stumbling all over yourself here, and it's kinda sad. The majority of players don't care for tier 10 because tier 10 is more difficult. My entire point in posting is a lot of high performance players prefer difficulty, so stating that tier 8-10 is unenjoyable due to passive play or that it's a "mess", which is what the OP is saying, and you're agreeing with him, about, is false.
  11. This made m cringe so hard it hurt physically.
  12. Yeah, 400 actually is a few relative to the 6000 I've played in regular matches. Since you're doing this weird, creepy homework trying to cherrypick the one bit of data from my profile that you think isn't very good (Newsflash, ranked doesn't matter), I'm sure you can find which seasons I have participated in. Namely, the pilot season, season one, about ten games out of season 2 and 3 respectively, and then skipping all of the ranked seasons until the last one, in which I played about 250 matches. I don't make excuses because I don't need them. You're bringing up ranked because you, what, think that since you won 70% of 44 games in the most recent season is some sort of indicator that you're anywhere near as good as I am? Are you joking? You're comparing a statistically insignificant number of battles to numbers that I put up when I was brand new to warships. Hunting and pecking through my profile is actually pretty pathetic. Thanks for the laugh at your expense. I didn't come here to measure stats with you, since you'd lose anyway, I came here to comment on my favorite tiers. The fact that you took personal offence when I pointed out that you are clearly not very good at high tiers is your own problem. The point of this thread is the tier 8-10 gap, and why people don't enjoy it. Well, plenty of people DO enjoy it, and they enjoy it because it is more difficult and has less room for error. I like that. It's why I play realistic battles on warthunder as well. I enjoy that the game is designed to scale in difficulty as the tiers go up. I can see why some people don't enjoy that, but that's also what keeps the mid tiers populated. Straight up declaring that the top tiers need to be "fixed" is just backwards thinking.
  13. Now, if it was something more nuanced and eclectic than dama-con use, yeah I would definitely listen to a purple before I'd listen to a red, because the purple has *evidence* that what he is doing works. Neither I nor anyone that I've seen just automatically assumes that purples are always right and reds are always wrong. That would be a black-or-white fallacy.
  14. If a unicum told me he instantly dama-conned and it worked for him, he would need to give a more detailed explanation as to how he was using it and what his justification was. You are starting out with a conclusion, and working backwards, like a creationist or a flat-earther.
  15. That wasn't part of the example. That was an aside to find out if you knew about those mods for your sake, since you brought up torpedo visibility.