Jump to content


Beta Testers
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


Community Reputation

44 Neutral

About TheHunter2_EAD

  • Rank
    Warrant Officer
  • Birthday 08/17/1990
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    New Bren NC

Recent Profile Visitors

1,324 profile views
  1. Aquila

    Yes it will.
  2. Aquila

    The Aquila might be a Premium CV for Tier V or VI. But if WG approve fighter-bombers for the game. Her aircraft are 51/66 Re.2001/Re. 2001G Fighter-Bombers: http://military.wikia.com/wiki/Reggiane_Re.2001 Aquila is a conversion ship. Speed 29.5 k Displacement 23,130 to 28,350. Length, m 207.4 pp 232.5 max Breadth, m 29.4 wl 30.1 fd Draught, m 7.31 Power, h.p. 151000. Armor belt: 600, magazines: 80-60, Steering: 30 Aircraft facilities (fd - 5,470m², ha - 2,880m² / ~ 15,800m³): Flight deck: 216.2x25.3m. Hangar: 160.0x18.0m. Two elevators, each (15.2x14.3m, 6.5t). There were 2 catapults of K-252 type. Aircraft fuel stowage: 327000l. http://www.navypedia.org/ships/italy/it_cv_aquila.htm
  3. Junyo if is possible?

    No one want to discuss any else say I'm wrong. So hurry up and put Junyo in the game and lock up this forum.

    I say Tier V because aircraft load out: Year fighters torpedo bombers diving bombers 9/1939 20 D.373 5 P.L.7 --- early 1940 --- --- 40 LN401 and V-156-F
  5. British / UK Carriers Clases

    Ur right on WG we never know. On rudder damage part aim ur trop bombers right u hit it. I like idea durable Carriers. HMS Ark Royal is 50% right choice for historical Bismarck hunt premium CV. But other 50% everyone wants it in a CV line because thinking it going to be like US CV's but it not. plz check aircraft loud out on link and u see want I mean: http://navypedia.org/ships/uk/brit_cv1_ark_royal.htm
  6. British / UK Carriers Clases

    FYI: We all agree on Ark Royal going to be a premium. The question is how it will be intimated into game. It going Kaga or seeing the in it earlier layout. http://navypedia.org/ships/uk/uk_carriers.htm
  7. IJN Akagi

    I got approve on one CV for tier VI from WG. To make up short line others are if there's interest : http://navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_cv_unryu.htm http://navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_cv_shinano.htm http://navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_cv_ibuki.htm
  8. Tell that to Essex. Has been crappy MM with team getting kill fast and last one not kill.
  9. WoWS Dev Blog: ST Changes to USS Midway CV

    I think this isn't year of CV.
  10. WoWS Dev Blog: ST Changes to USS Midway CV

    We're to late I'm on my tester account and they nerf the midway fighters
  11. Junyo if is possible?

    Everyone going to get Junyo at tier VI with 7/1942 with all 48 aircraft at tier VI. So fold my hand give in to it. Unless WG has other plans which they wont say anything.
  12. British / UK Carriers Clases

    ^ I agree with HMS_Formidable. U have to more knowledgeable.
  13. WoWS Dev Blog: ST Changes to USS Midway CV

    It's stupid to me. WG has done enough to USA CV line. Everyone including me agreeing with you. Is WoWS Dev have heads all the way up there ***.
  14. British / UK Carriers Clases

    I can't argue with that. In ur option Ark Royal should be like the Kaga
  15. USSR Heavy Cruiser

    I agree