Jump to content

triptyx

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    3,187
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    58

Community Reputation

630 Excellent

About triptyx

  • Rank
    Commander
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    KTKI

WG

  • Position
    ---

Recent Profile Visitors

4,526 profile views

Single Status Update

See all updates by triptyx

  1. Something wrong about pre-release wiki:the Independent Class is tier 5 ,not 6......

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. wjmconfi

      wjmconfi

      Posted 03 April 2013 - 02:53 AM

      WoWS Producer

       

      Developers

      64

      Member since:

      08-09-2012

      Azumazi, on 31 March 2013 - 01:26 PM, said:

      Okay Teit, this question is coming up due to some research I ran across while working on my French tree while reading about ANZAC operations in WW1 for my thread here http://forum.worldof...-another-topic/

       

      I ran into a bit of an odd situation. The Ibuki class (The 1907 design) and not the later 1943 CA Design, wa...

    3. wjmconfi

      wjmconfi

      The answer of Teit:

      1. Ibuki-1907 will not planning in the game.

      2. Trees... It's very interesting question :)

      Well, many ships are identical to ships in developers trees. Some even on the same positions.

      For example:

      1. Japan tree. BB A140 Hiraga, BB№13 and BC-65 at the same tiers. Сruisers branch are generally very similar to ours. Carriers are also many where the same. Congradulations

      2. USA tree. CL Atlanta and CVL Independence at the same tiers. ВВs br...

    4. wjmconfi

      wjmconfi

      And here is the link of trees:http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/2381-azmazis-tech-tree-designs-continued-from-another-topic/

    5. Show next comments  3 more
×