Jump to content
Forum Shutdown - July 28, 2023 Read more... ×
Forum Shutdown - July 28, 2023 Read more... ×

sheep21

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    170
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    4817

Community Reputation

39 Neutral

2 Followers

About sheep21

  • Rank
    Chief Petty Officer
  • Birthday 08/19/1987
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    London, U.K.

Recent Profile Visitors

787 profile views
  1. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    so it was announced in twitch stream that the actual renown we all wanted will be released as premium ship @ tier 7...
  2. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    its disgusting. they made repulse a premium and i thought fair, we get the upgraded renown in tech tree. instead we have a gimped renown that to my mind is worse than repulse. I guess in 6 months we will see a premium historical "renown 1942" on sale... money grabbers.
  3. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    with all due respect, we are also aware that wargaming are aware of this as it is your decision to make this change. No other ship in the game has been introduced in breakers yard configuration. Why isnt Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya ingame in her School ship refit. the issue here is you have taken an important, notable vessel and instead of taking the time to make the ship as she fought work in your game through stat changes, decided to go CRTL X with the model and just delete 60% of her secondary battery. How bad are things in your serbian studio that they cannot take the time to balance a ship properly? What did your historical consultants say?
  4. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    have now played a few battles over the evening, Repulse, the weaker, less modernised sister is the stronger of the two twins despite everything. WG you have created a situation where your game has outdated vessel better than the upgraded one. I applaud your incompetence in ship balancing. it knows no depths....
  5. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    its "flavour" add ramming flag and speed flag ( high speed due to no top weight anyway) and ram other ships, would work for Genisenau's historically accurate post 43 refit too!
  6. not enough changes to ship models. Would like to see more ships in their laid up configuration ala renown
  7. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    or Gneisenau 1943 refit with Main battery and secondary armament landed? (picture sunk as block ship in final configuration post 1945)
  8. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    Got a new idea for WG @Ahskance Nagato in 1945 "refit"! With her secondary armament & AAA landed! nagato 1945 photo.webp
  9. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    and yet here we are. I know of no other ship this has happened to ingame from my recollection... extremely dissapointed to see a historical ship treated this way.
  10. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    this is my fear 6 months from now we have: "Captains! Now available in the armoury the deadly Renown in her WW2 Configuration, yours to own for a bazillion dubloons" if they thought 20 4.5" barrels was too OP for her then nerf their AA and surface stats, I would rather have a historical config as a fighting ship than a bloody breakers yard config. its just awful.
  11. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    exactly, i cannot think of another ship in the game in "breakers yard" configuration....
  12. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    some of us appreciate the ships we sail in looking like they actually were...
  13. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    I am sorry but a state in 1945 post war, a state she never saw active service in is the best representationfor the game? If WG felt 20 4.5" guns was too much at tier 6 (and if so why is QE okay with it?) Why not nerf the stats to get the effect rather than presenting her in a way she never saw active service? People will say "lol arcade game" but being here since the begining I know WG crowed how the ships would be accurate, I see how WG pay youtubers to promote the game and state it is historically accurate and then this presented to us? Do what you will with fantasy ships but when you have real, distinguished vessels, don't use half baked reasoning for a butchering of a vessel...
  14. losing 50% of the historical secondary batter for a gimmick torpedo is a really bad decision.
  15. sheep21

    Renown is Wrong

    absolutely disgusting... QE has her rebuild armament of 4.5" guns, Renown nerfed into the ground for heavy AA... absolute joke to use a fit when she was placed in reserve after the war was over. sickening.
×