Jump to content


Beta Testers
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles


Community Reputation

779 Excellent

About Sakuzhi

  • Rank
    Rear Admiral
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling


  1. EA SW Battlefront DISASTER

    https://www.gamespot.com/articles/star-wars-battlefront-2-removes-microtransactions-/1100-6455042/ Loot boxes canned. Furthermore for all of the reddit-goons. https://www.ea.com/games/starwars/battlefront/battlefront-2/news/swbfii-changes-launch The 'unlocked' upgrades was changed weeks ago. Maybe people should actually you know, get up to date data before throwing poo all over the place. But that'd be wanting people to get an informed opinion instead of listening to some youtuber's opinion and pass it off as fact. Which continues to be overly difficult for most people, clearly.
  2. New Midway Changes

    Unless they changed the stats of those bombers. None of your complaints about the Midways bombers stand up to anything. unless you are talking about the Enterprise, which isn't terribly important in the discussion of the Midway.
  3. EA SW Battlefront DISASTER

    Better question. Why through a crapfit at EA? Let's not even get into the fact that you don't need to get crates to get characters (Fact, you simply 'buy' them with credits that you can earn in one night per one hero if you really wanted) Or the fact that the Gun options for each class aren't loot-box based and haven't been for over a month (you get kills with class? Get the guns, simple) So, The best thing about people throwing a bunch of crapat this game about 'this' thing? It's an issue that EA put out an announcement for 2-3 weeks back in the first place. But you know, research and whatnot, too difficult. Nothing more than players taking old data to throw crap at a company that has long since been surpassed by Ubsoft at being the worst Gaming Developer. Too typical for internet goons.
  4. New Midway Changes

    Struggles to get the bombers close enough to get good hits. Not to mention the fact that you still can miss when your bombing circle is smaller than the ship you are bombing which never ceases to amuse. How about realize you have 2 flights of USN TBs with superior drop patterns instead of whining about the best-non AP bombers in the entire game?
  5. EA SW Battlefront DISASTER

    The odd thing about this? They you know, changed that a while back. But people are so quick to crapall over everything from EA that it doesn't even matter
  6. Basically. How overwhlelmingly [edited] the Graf Zeps AP Bombs are now that the Developers showed everyone they have no [edited]clue how to balance anything because they can instant-delete same tier Battleships with a manual Drop and have bombs to spare. Also, don't worry, it's every Battleship, not just KM one's because the developers decided to give the Bombers a better fuze, a better max penetration, a better damage, and more of them. Versus the Graf Zep is an OP piece of crapthat needs to be re-nerfed into the stone age and people get their money back.
  7. You are pretty much an idiot I see. Good to know, but for your simple, idiotic mind I'll [edited]tell you a few things. Chaining Battleships to Cruisers that may or may not have DF-AA, that may or may not USE IT is pretty much the most retartded [edited]thing ever. Not to mention I've been killed by the [edited]fantasy Graf while doing everything, including having a USN Cruiser CLOSE to me. So yeah, how about this, next time you think of typing, stop, then shut the [edited] up. I've been killed at Full heatlth as a Bismarck by the [edited] Graf while in my own [edited]spawn not 3 minutes into the [edited]game. I have been killed while at 30k+ HP in a QE, with an AA BUILD with a NOLA within 6km of me, with the [edited]Comically busted Graf-craphaving to dive bomb the worst possible [edited]angle. Still dead. crapis OP, and needs to be nerfed into the [edited]ground, it's [edited]comical how idiotically powerful the DBs are on the Graf right now. They are just "insert instant delete here" unless the other CV can murder them, all 15+ of them. And as mentioned, that's a bunch of horse-crap. It's one thing to get killed when you make a mistake with over 50% of your HP left, it's another when you literally do everything correct, use 'teamwork' and you just get killed anyway because of moronic [edited]Developers that couldn't balance a CV for crapso everyone know has to deal with the massively UP Fighters and the Massively OP crapBombers. Don't worry, they do the same crapto cruisers as well.
  8. Here's the deal. the USN AP bombs are fine. The KM Ones, will put it this way. They OH-Wipe a Full HP Bismarck, period, the end. That crapneeds to be re-nerfed into the ground. Doubly so seeing as they are pretty much skill-less to use. The Enterprise on the other hand will do 'maybe' 1/2 to 2/3s with their DBs, which is far less lel, [edited]OP as crap. The Developers at the end of the day over-buffed the crapout of the Stuka's.
  9. Fact, USN DDs have it worst. Quit [edited].
  10. Who have you seen in game

    Saw @Cobraclutch Last night. Would have been more fun the match didn't go south in the first few minutes.
  11. They also would get their asses kicked because they do not own the Enterprise. The only way they would win that suit is if it was very clearly a Star trek thing.
  12. Carrier Event weekend

    Like I've mentioned before, use IJN CVs, the Big E will be much easier if you are used to using 5+ Flight groups.
  13. The problem isn't that the AP bombs shouldn't work. It's that WG fail-armoring decks so they are thicker than they should be historically due to pure laziness makes the AP bombs not as effective as they could be. For example, Nelsons should be fearing the Hand of God from on high in terms of AP bombs. In Game? Well it benefits from having an extra 12.5mm thick top deck which makes it nearly immune to getting Citadeled to [edited] like German BBs.
  14. If they could, they wouldn't ask for it you brainless [edited]potato.
  15. RN BB's were a mistake?

    There is no range that a vertical plate of the same thickness would have superior protection to an angled one prior to that actually. You literally have no idea what you are talking about on that case. Even at the range 'band' you are talking about, the difference between teh 45' angled turret face against a flat one is meaningless for about 5'~ either way, I was simply being 'kind' before, the reality is that the USN Turret armor is outright superior starting from 1914, at ranges where foreseen naval ranges were handled, given that the 'difference' in protection is at best a toss-up out to and including 25,000yards. And that the longest actual hits ever from Naval cannons are at 26,000 yards. Yeah, it's simply better, sorry teaboo's, it's not good enough. And no, it would never be completely neutralized at those angles, if you think shell normalization goes -that- far you really need to go start reading up on how penetration by kinetic projectiles work. It isn't HESH. Vanguard says hello. And 330mm Turret faces weren't good enough back in 1914, they sure as hell weren't good enough in in the 40s. I like vague non-specific words to describe complex systems, honest. Flooding isn't the issue, suddenly exploding was. And the British do not have anything near a good track record when it comes to Not-suddenly-exploding, or Damage control in general honestly. That would be unlikely given that the British pretty much ignored using interlocks until Jutland. And I believe there has been some talk that they ignored it afterwards because of politics. Here's the difference between the SoDak and say, pretty much the rest of those examples. ^That would involve a penetration of some Variety. So the Scharnhorst was penetrated. As for the Bismarck, the Germans much like the British, didn't properly armor their turrets. And All of them were outright destroyed, don't quite get why you thought to point out why the flat-turret design is pretty much flawed. Finally, unlike literally every other ship you brought up. The Sodak's Turret wasn't even 'jammed' in the first place, the Green as Grass crew were being overly cautious nothing more. So no, there is no declining returns to armoring your turret or your barbette's. That's why the USN and IJN continued to increase their Turret armor as increasingly more powerful Cannons were made available. Quite a bit of difference than losing your turret completely because you are still using a WW1 Armor profile on your Turrets because your Navy basically had no real advancement in Battleship design since 1919. https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/w/war-damage-reports/uss-south-dakota-bb57-war-damage-report-no57.html