Jump to content


So, I need to sink two cruisers for a campaign task ...


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

Lert #1 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:37 PM

    Admiral

  • Supertester
  • In AlfaTesters
    Beta Testers

  • 11,549
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

 

Riiiiiiiight. Cruisers ... Cruisers ... What do those look like again?


(Above stats not guaranteed accurate. I'm a supertester and test ships don't always register correctly)

 

Ship hipster: I liked Alabama before it was cool


DokturProfesur #2 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:38 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Testers

  • 1,767
  • Member since:
    01-17-2013
MM looks like it's favoring your opponents there.

 

As a pretty strict BB player since beta, I would like to point out that I think torpedos are fine, HE damage is fine -fire chance and/or fire damage notwithstanding-, carriers are fine, and generally cruiser RoF is fine.

 

My tendency to think my team will follow me into the jaws of glory, however, is what's wrong.


FayFay731 #3 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:39 PM

    Master Chief Petty Officer

  • Members

  • 326
  • Member since:
    04-21-2013
There would be one if a Khabarovsk was there.

Lert #4 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:39 PM

    Admiral

  • Supertester
  • In AlfaTesters
    Beta Testers

  • 11,549
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

View PostDokturProfesur, on 19 May 2017 - 09:38 PM, said:

MM looks like it's favoring your opponents there.

 

Well, we did lose.

(Above stats not guaranteed accurate. I'm a supertester and test ships don't always register correctly)

 

Ship hipster: I liked Alabama before it was cool


TalonV #5 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:39 PM

    Admiral of the Navy

  • Alpha Tester
  • Beta Testers

  • 27,502
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012
Well this is what happens, when they do a campaign that favors BBs. Not a cruiser left to be found.

 

​This isn't dueling pistols at dawn. This is war. In war you

never want to fight fair. You want to sneak up behind

the enemy, and bash him over the head.


Destroyer_Kiyoshimo #6 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:39 PM

    Admiral

  • Beta Testers

  • 12,036
  • Member since:
    05-25-2014
Too many destroyers in this match. They clearly need more nerfs.

 Kiyoshimo's aircraft carrier rework Kiyoshimo's Torpedo Campaign

I am the Hull of my Torpedo. Steel is my body and Oxygen is my blood. I have caused over one thousand hull breaches. Unknown to flames, nor known to penetrate. I have withstood pain to launch many torpedoes. Yet those guns will never shoot anything.
So, as I pray-- Unlimited Torpedo Works


DreadRaybo #7 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:40 PM

    Petty Officer

  • Members

  • 55
  • Member since:
    06-30-2014
Well Lert, as I recall, the NC and the Iowa have been referred to as Battle Cruisers, so I'm sure that would work, right? :trollface:

Zero_Kelvin #8 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:40 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Members

  • 464
  • Member since:
    09-15-2016
Is everyone ready to admit that BBs need to go?

This user has been DELETED


Lert #9 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:40 PM

    Admiral

  • Supertester
  • In AlfaTesters
    Beta Testers

  • 11,549
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

View PostZero_Kelvin, on 19 May 2017 - 09:40 PM, said:

Is everyone ready to admit that BBs need to go?

 

Nope!

(Above stats not guaranteed accurate. I'm a supertester and test ships don't always register correctly)

 

Ship hipster: I liked Alabama before it was cool


TalonV #10 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:41 PM

    Admiral of the Navy

  • Alpha Tester
  • Beta Testers

  • 27,502
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

View PostZero_Kelvin, on 19 May 2017 - 04:40 PM, said:

Is everyone ready to admit that BBs need to go?

 

Do you ever say anything positive?

 

​This isn't dueling pistols at dawn. This is war. In war you

never want to fight fair. You want to sneak up behind

the enemy, and bash him over the head.


CorradoG60 #11 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Members

  • 411
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012
Ah just go to a lower tier and they will come.


Zero_Kelvin #12 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:41 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Members

  • 464
  • Member since:
    09-15-2016

View PostTalonV, on 19 May 2017 - 01:41 PM, said:

 

Do you ever say anything positive?

 

Is there a reason for me to be positive?

 

Does negativity detract from a valid point?

 

No to both.


Edited by Zero_Kelvin, 19 May 2017 - 09:43 PM.

This user has been DELETED


Chien_Lu_Anderman #13 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:42 PM

    Commander

  • Beta Testers
  • In AlfaTesters

  • 3,187
  • Member since:
    03-26-2013

View PostTalonV, on 19 May 2017 - 04:41 PM, said:

 

Do you ever say anything positive?

 

Not that I can tell .  :honoring:

 

 

 

CPU   Intel I7-4770 3.4Ghz/ 3.84Ghz with turbo      GPU   NVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2G      Ram   12gig and 26.2gig available on a flash drive configured for ready boost    HDD   1Tb 7200rpm    OS   Windows 8.1


DokturProfesur #14 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:43 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Testers

  • 1,767
  • Member since:
    01-17-2013

View PostZero_Kelvin, on 19 May 2017 - 01:40 PM, said:

Is everyone ready to admit that BBs need to go?

 

Then what would DDs and CVs have to do? They need their pinatas.

 

As a pretty strict BB player since beta, I would like to point out that I think torpedos are fine, HE damage is fine -fire chance and/or fire damage notwithstanding-, carriers are fine, and generally cruiser RoF is fine.

 

My tendency to think my team will follow me into the jaws of glory, however, is what's wrong.


Stampz #15 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:47 PM

    Master Chief Petty Officer

  • Beta Testers

  • 362
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012
I'm hesitant to play my cruisers with the current amount of BBs in queue; however, now might be a good time to brush the dust off my DDs.

Excield #16 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:48 PM

    Lieutenant Commander

  • Members

  • 2,959
  • Member since:
    12-29-2015
The Amagi's a Battlecruiser :trollface:

pmgaudio #17 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:49 PM

    Vice Admiral

  • Members

  • 8,786
  • Member since:
    05-30-2013

View PostZero_Kelvin, on 19 May 2017 - 09:41 PM, said:

 

Is there a reason for me to be positive?

 

Does negativity detract from a valid point?

 

No to both.

 

but there was nothing valid about your comment....nothing at all



 “Leave the gun....
Take the Cannoli”
  __Clemenza

 

:child:


Zero_Kelvin #18 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:51 PM

    Warrant Officer

  • Members

  • 464
  • Member since:
    09-15-2016

View Postpmgaudio, on 19 May 2017 - 01:49 PM, said:

 

but there was nothing valid about your comment....nothing at all

 

I think the obscene number of battleships and the numerous complaints about them is validation enough.

 

Just get rid of them. It'll only make things better.


Edited by Zero_Kelvin, 19 May 2017 - 09:52 PM.

This user has been DELETED


pyantoryng #19 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:53 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Alpha Tester

  • 1,870
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

Ride a cruiser...wait, does it specify that it has to be battleships?



KaptainKaybe #20 Posted 19 May 2017 - 09:55 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Members

  • 1,801
  • Member since:
    08-14-2012

Yeah, I have a 2 cruiser kill mission on my Hood.

 

I'm not generally fond of these as I'm always afraid of missing out on a kill because some DD took out the remaining 500 hp from a target I just citadeled. On the other hand, I feel dirty 'kill securing' a target with a sliver of health I haven't fired on previously ;)






6 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users