Jump to content


Which is (or will be) a better deal?


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

Poll: Premium CVs (10 members have cast votes)

Which Premium CV would be a better buy?

  1. Saipan (8 votes [80.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 80.00%

  2. Kaga (2 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

SeaKnight_1990 #1 Posted 30 April 2017 - 03:37 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Members

  • 517
  • Member since:
    10-23-2015
Of the two premium carriers (one in game, one soon to be in game,) which would be a better value for money and why?

 

dark.png


Carrier_Lexington #2 Posted 30 April 2017 - 03:42 AM

    Ensign

  • Members

  • 1,160
  • Member since:
    12-25-2014

Kaga may get the 12 Torpedo Bombers, but they're all T6 and it will be seeing up to T9.

 

Whereas Saipan has that brutal immunity to strafe-escapes, and the powerful Skyraider Torpedoes.

 

Saipan Is, Saipan Was, and Saipan Is To Come.


"Heresy!"


Unabletony #3 Posted 30 April 2017 - 03:43 AM

    Rear Admiral

  • Members

  • 7,624
  • Member since:
    10-31-2015

Do you want to have tier 6 planes at tier 7 which will see tier 9, but torps are so fast that they're lightning, not to add that the bomb circle for manual drop is ultra tight? Or do you want USA-bias and go tier 7 with tier 9 planes that stay up forever, and bomb the shite out of people?

 

Each CV comes with salt, WG is not responsible for the amount of salt farmed. Overdose of salt is dangerous. WG is also no responsible for deaths by salt.


Edited by Unabletony, 30 April 2017 - 03:43 AM.

Because Hyuuga is cute~

Azuki is my catpanion~

Take that, Nyagato-sempai~!

 


BladedPheonix #4 Posted 30 April 2017 - 03:45 AM

    Captain

  • Alpha Tester

  • 5,553
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012
Saipan. The tier 9 fighters will crush anything tier 7 and 8 can throw at it. and assuming you're a good CV player, you'll always dominate the skies with your corsares!:read_fish:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users