Jump to content


Alabama Review - Solid But Difficult

Alabama Review

  • Please log in to reply
49 replies to this topic

iChase #1 Posted 12 March 2017 - 07:10 AM

    Ensign

  • WoWS Community Contributors

  • 995
  • Member since:
    07-15-2013

Core i7-4790K, ZOTAC GTX980 AMP!, 16GB RAM (1866Mhz), 2X128GB SSD, 9TB (1TB + 2X4TB) HDD, EVGA SuperNova 850G2

Youtube Channel | Twitch Channel | Discord Community | The Penguin Alliance - Clan Recruitment |


HazeGrayUnderway #2 Posted 12 March 2017 - 07:13 AM

    Rear Admiral

  • Members

  • 6,054
  • Member since:
    03-13-2015
Welcome to the fray, iChase :honoring:

Redaction #3 Posted 12 March 2017 - 07:14 AM

    Lieutenant Junior Grade

  • Beta Testers

  • 1,268
  • Member since:
    05-14-2014
Good preview iChase, thanks.

" I freed over a 1000 slaves, I could have freed 1000 more if they knew they were slaves" -Harriet Tubman

"Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -Benjamin Franklin


iChase #4 Posted 12 March 2017 - 07:16 AM

    Ensign

  • WoWS Community Contributors

  • 995
  • Member since:
    07-15-2013

View PostHazeGrayUnderway, on 12 March 2017 - 02:13 AM, said:

Welcome to the fray, iChase :honoring:

tossing my thoughts into this :B

 

View PostRedaction, on 12 March 2017 - 02:14 AM, said:

Good preview iChase, thanks.

Thanks :great:


Core i7-4790K, ZOTAC GTX980 AMP!, 16GB RAM (1866Mhz), 2X128GB SSD, 9TB (1TB + 2X4TB) HDD, EVGA SuperNova 850G2

Youtube Channel | Twitch Channel | Discord Community | The Penguin Alliance - Clan Recruitment |


Chobittsu #5 Posted 12 March 2017 - 08:41 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Testers

  • 1,605
  • Member since:
    05-07-2011
:|  
You're not LWM... where'd my mousey?


CorgiFleet_33 - Dec 18, 2016    -    Corgi_Fleet_71 - Feb 17, 2017


BladedPheonix #6 Posted 12 March 2017 - 08:59 AM

    Captain

  • Alpha Tester

  • 5,138
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

Love the new forum icon you choice I-chase!

 

Also hope your mother gets better soon! :aqua:



Lonewolfpj #7 Posted 12 March 2017 - 09:28 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Members

  • 1,883
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012
Thanks for all the work you do.

Excield #8 Posted 12 March 2017 - 09:38 AM

    Lieutenant Commander

  • Members

  • 2,043
  • Member since:
    12-29-2015
Lower the citadel, and I'll buy the Deluxe package! Otherwise, I'm only getting the base one at best :x

_WaveRider_ #9 Posted 12 March 2017 - 10:01 AM

    Warrant Officer

  • Members

  • 573
  • Member since:
    02-03-2017

Great post, thank you.

 

I just watch BB reviews to see where their weaknesses are.

 

Allows me to understand where the next nerf to the other classes will be. :P



IJN_Hyuga #10 Posted 12 March 2017 - 10:52 AM

    Master Chief Petty Officer

  • Members

  • 375
  • Member since:
    08-10-2016
Still lost as to the point of this.

[KNMSU] is seeking new members. Please PM me before applying! Thank you!


LittleWhiteMouse #11 Posted 12 March 2017 - 10:53 AM

    Captain

  • WoWS Community Contributors
  • Members
    Beta Testers

  • 5,374
  • Member since:
    01-04-2013
Great review, Chase.  I'm still bitter about the DEBBs making citadel mechanics idiot proof -- not so much for their inclusion, but how they've changed the culture and meta around what's an acceptable battleship and what isn't.  I had a lot of success in Alabama (so much so that I mistakenly thought her accuracy was better than North Carolina, Iowa, Missouri and Montana).  Expose your side and you'll get punished.  I'm still trying to appreciate how this is a bad thing in people's minds....

Carl #12 Posted 12 March 2017 - 12:08 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Testers

  • 1,934
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

View PostLittleWhiteMouse, on 12 March 2017 - 10:53 AM, said:

Great review, Chase.  I'm still bitter about the DEBBs making citadel mechanics idiot proof -- not so much for their inclusion, but how they've changed the culture and meta around what's an acceptable battleship and what isn't.  I had a lot of success in Alabama (so much so that I mistakenly thought her accuracy was better than North Carolina, Iowa, Missouri and Montana).  Expose your side and you'll get punished.  I'm still trying to appreciate how this is a bad thing in people's minds....

 

IMO it's really simple mouse. Flexibility is generally considered more useful than extreme's in one or two area's. Although what counts as flexible is very meta dependent. The KM BB's are incredibly flexible as a whole, unless your trying to snipe from extreme range there's little they do poorly. So it's very hard to get them into a bad situation in general terms beyond very obvious basic mistakes.

 

The citadels certainly get a lot of credit, but it's a long way from the whole story.

 

Equally i think a lot of it is meta changes rather than KM BB's specifically that have transformed opinions on citadels. Remember back in beta when most BB drivers advised not targeting cruisers because they were too hard to kill. Now look at the high tier cruiser situation. People have learned about vulnerabilities and adjusted their targeting appropriately. And ofc the KM BB's will have pushed people to target the non-KM BB's even more as their a so much easier target. All of this produces a very real change in perceived durability on the user end and elevates one of the ships weaknesses a little bit more. Simply put the degree to which a tall citadel is a disadvantage has grown in real terms over time IMO. KM BB's just accelerated the percolation to general consciousness by providing a sharp contrast.

 

That doesn't mean i disagree with your Alabam review, but i also don;t think the changes in citadel perception have been entirely driven by how good the KM are in that regard, rather i think they highlighted an issue that was allready there and on the cusp of being generally noticed.



Sir_Davos_Seaworth #13 Posted 12 March 2017 - 12:30 PM

    Lieutenant Junior Grade

  • Members

  • 1,316
  • Member since:
    03-17-2016

SEVEN HELLS SHE HAS A CITADEL?!?! Wargaming hates America!!!!

 

 

 

:trollface::trollface::trollface::trollface:

 

No really, she is a high Tier USN BB....I'm just not sure what people were expecting?


Fleet in Being at Put-In-Bay Ohio: Brig, Niagara. Ironclad, Michigan (latter Wolverine)

Fleet in Being at Dragonstone: DDs Umikaze Iskaze. Clemson. Wakatake. Farragut CAs Dresden, Edmen Murmansk  Kirov. Aboa Graf Spee (grind) Myoko Budyonny Arp Takao  Belfast (gift)  CB Ishizuchi Scharnhorst Gneisenau  BB  Arp Kongo Arp Hiei Warspite  Kaiser Bayern Bismarck

 


KnightFandragon #14 Posted 12 March 2017 - 12:31 PM

    Lieutenant Junior Grade

  • Members

  • 1,280
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012
Its actually very sad to see WG still hasnt learned their lesson on USN BBs.  Another chance to NOT [edited]it over with the high [edited]citadel and yet they dun [edited] it up again.

KnightFandragon #15 Posted 12 March 2017 - 12:33 PM

    Lieutenant Junior Grade

  • Members

  • 1,280
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

View PostSir_Davos_Seaworth, on 12 March 2017 - 12:30 PM, said:

SEVEN HELLS SHE HAS A CITADEL?!?! Wargaming hates America!!!!

 

 

 

:trollface::trollface::trollface::trollface:

 

No really, she is a high Tier USN BB....I'm just not sure what people were expecting?

 

What I dont understand is why WG insists on making the citadel so high in the first place.  You ALREADY take more damage when you sit and stay broadside, there is no need to amplify the damage by making the critical hit zone a 50% chance or better to be hit.  We already know to angle, we already know all that crap.  There is no point in making it almost an assured hit on every shot.  There is no need to [edited]the ship over with such a large delete zone.  TUrning a T8+ BB into a fat [edited]cruiser is just stupid. 

hipcanuck #16 Posted 12 March 2017 - 12:33 PM

    Ensign

  • Beta Testers

  • 907
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

IMO citadels are a way to make the game move along faster. Cit hits, again IMO, should be broken down further into 2 areas, machinery and magazines. Mag hits do the same damage as now, perhaps a detonation, perhaps not, but a loss of reload speed for sure. Machinery hits do half the full citadel damage, but reduce speed.

 

Tanking is gamey, reversing is gamey, camping is gamey. Gamey is no different that gimmicky really. Ships that didnt move rolled a lot, as in 15-20 degree rolls, anyone who's every been on a ship knows that stopped ships roll violently in mild swells and will be rapidly pushed sideways to the current. Moving at speed allows the ship to cut through the swells and maintain enough stability that the guns can compensate for roll and pitch.



LittleWhiteMouse #17 Posted 12 March 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Captain

  • WoWS Community Contributors
  • Members
    Beta Testers

  • 5,374
  • Member since:
    01-04-2013

That's a good analysis, Carl (have a +1), and I don't see any faults with your line of reasoning.  I don't tend to shoot often at Battleships, especially not German ones (I focus on destroyers and cruisers first -- they die faster). When I do, it's always when a broadside is offered so I can take a huge chunk of their hit points away from them.  Given the choice between an IJN, USN or KMS battleship to shoot at, all things being equal, you can bet I'll be going for the ones I can citadel rather than ones I cannot.  It gives me a better chance of removing a ship instead of simply damaging it.  I don't think any of us were expecting the Kriegsmarine to shake up the battleship meta as significantly as it has.

 

This makes me wonder at what the Royal Navy Battleships and Soviet Navy Battleships will bring when they're introduced.  Will either of them be game changers?  I suspect the Soviet Battleships will be a contender if, by popular suspicion, they bring another 460mm gun armed behemoth at tier 10.  I can't foresee the Royal Navy being as significant a contributor.  My best estimations will be that early ships will appear quite similar to IJN Battleships and later ships will seem almost American.  The line may appear to be decidedly average, taken as a whole.  I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see the Royal Navy taking primacy and it will take more radical designs, either Soviet, French or Italian to unseat the Kriegsmarine as the go-to Battleships in World of Warships.

 

 



Carl #18 Posted 12 March 2017 - 01:26 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Testers

  • 1,934
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

Thanks, hope my other post in your own thread doesn't come off wrong btw.

 

I'll comment on the RN below as i've done a few ADLA's on them and considered a few more, (but no repeats or you'd have got KGV by now, that one ship i really want to break everything down on in real detail), but i just want to make a couple of other comments on the whole Flexibility thing. I brought it up because when you see the good tanks discussed in WoT flexibility is a key point. good enemy players will try to create situations where your only options are bad options. The more flexible you are the harder that is to do. Atlanta is sort of the ultimate WoWs example of hyper inflexible and it's pitfalls at work.

 

As for the RN. One thing that's nearly certain to be true is very good concealment but poor range. Warspite is one of the tallest (only the Nelsons are noticeably taller), and has one of the highest mounted directors. So she's likely to have one of the highest tier for tier ranges and concealments of any of the RN BB's. When they come along Repulse and Renown are likely to be able to get sub 11km, possibly sub 10km concealment in full builds. Tehey also have pretty good AAA. i haven;t mentioned this much in my ADLA video's, but  i wouldn't rule out CV DF on Rn BB's from T6 up.

 

Talking of CV's. I think a resurgence in CV population if WG'ing get the CV rework right would do a lot to shake up the meta and perceptions of strength vs durability vs flexibility. It wouldn't really touch Bismark, (damm it does she need a nerf), but most of the rest would see some adjustment with likely only Gini getting stronger. Also a resurgence in cruiser would lily hurt the Km BB's quite a bit. Scharnhorst aside they tend to be the worst at killing cruisers, and not really any more durable vs them, so if they suddenly got more desirable in some fashion with more presence you'd see the Km take a hit. They're really optimized for a BB heavy meta where caps are super important, (mush as Heavy tanks in WoT would be a lot more valuable in a WoT domination mode, when you cna;t hit and run all match without win chance consequences due to giving up caps, the tanks that can sit and slug it out gain value). Change the environment and they lose some strengths and attendant flexibility.


Edited by Carl, 12 March 2017 - 01:26 PM.


Phoenix_jz #19 Posted 12 March 2017 - 02:52 PM

    Commander

  • Beta Testers

  • 3,526
  • Member since:
    05-06-2013
There's a very simple reason why German BBs do so well, imo.

Their armor, as already mentioned, is idiot-proof.

Their secondaries make it very dangerous to stay near them.

Their large amount of secondaries means they have lots of DP guns, which means they have more DPS at long range than other nation's usually... And long range dps is the most important by far.

Their only 'drawbacks' are the generally inferior TDS and firepower.

Which doesn't matter.

TDS usually isn't awful enough to make it worse than other BBs at your tier, with some exceptions.

And the worse firepower means nothing, because every shot you take in WoWs is generally at short to medium ranges for naval gunnery.

The ranges we fight at in WoWs is typically well below the ranges at which the belts of BBs are able to resist BB firepower, which is part of the reason deck-pens (without overmatch) is nigh impossible.

This isn't helped by the game's emphasis on horizontal rather than vertical dispersion, which is somewhat opposite to what happened in naval warfare. This is part of the reason why sailing broadside, aside from firepower benefits, was preferable to sailing at the enemy head-on. Not only were you directing your strongest armor at the enemy, but you were also reducing the probability of you being hit!

And despite the fact many of the KM guns are weaker... Being weaker at the ranges we're talking about is honestly a question of the guns just not being overkill... Or at least, less overkill.

Even at tier X, one doesn't need 16in guns to citadel a broadside BB
15in guns will do the work just fine... However, given the way overmatch mechanics work, the extra size of higher caliber shells has more of a relevancy than their greater penetration, and even damage.

Unless there is a way to balance the extreme power of guns relative to armor at the ranges we fight... Well, KM BBs will likely stay as one of the strongest lines in the game, no matter what other nations you add. Their protection schemes offer only benefits at the ranges we fight, and only becomes a liability well past our typical engagement ranges.

My 2¢

 

My "Directory of Threads" <-- Various threads I've done you might find interesting, feel free to check it out!

​Most recent addition: USN Cruiser Split


Carl #20 Posted 12 March 2017 - 03:04 PM

    Lieutenant

  • Beta Testers

  • 1,934
  • Member since:
    08-09-2012

Block Quote

 which is part of the reason deck-pens (without overmatch) is nigh impossible.

 

Actually most of the BB guns could penetrate most cruiser citadel roofs if autoubounce wasn't a thing at quite modest ranges.

 

Also the DP thing is a bit of a fallacy. It on;y applies to the T6 and T7. Grober and freddy are worse than the US, as is Tirpitz and Bismark.

 

Lastly the firepower disadvantage is more in dispersion and especially alpha/DPM. Also most of them really don;t have the pen to go through same tier citedels all the way out to maximum range, unlike their contemporaries. I agree it's generally less relevant as not a lot of shooting happens at those ranges, but it is there.


Edited by Carl, 12 March 2017 - 03:05 PM.






Also tagged with Alabama, Review

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users